That right there - that is me. Of COURSE I always look exactly like that :-D. As you can see, I look sort of - well, you know. Unspecified. What ethnicity would you say I was? Do you have one particular idea en tête, or would you hedge your bets?Anyone who reads this blog regularly (not a lot of you, I'd warrant) knows that I'm of Indian extraction. The only person to ever guess that correctly, however, was a Turkish man. The most frequent guesses are Iranian, Greek, Spanish and Turkish. The first two in particular.
So, what was the point of all this apparent navel-gazing and skin-based angsting? Well, this post was inspired by a sarky comment in response to a comment of mine. The poster wrote:
Personally I've yet to cash in on my white male privilige, but if I could get one of the brotherhood to get me a well-paid sinecure, a detatched house in Shropshire & a ridiculously beautiful wife I'd be grateful. The system surely wouldn't leave one of its own living on a council estate in Stoke, would it? But I must have been absent on the day they taught us how to exploit our advantages...
This didn't make me as angry as it might've. Strange formulation that - but accurate. I think the fact that the poster didn't dismiss the notion of privilege outright gave me hope. I got a picture of somebody who doesn't fully understand how racial privilege works (fair enough, it's not particularly easy to explain or understand).
I decided to strike back at this using my own personal experience. Many white people, especially those who are of working-class backgrounds but educated (like this fella was) have a hard time accepting the fact that they have an advantage over people who aren't white. Given that there are highly successful middle-class Asians and blacks in this country, you can sort of almost see what they mean.
However, the fact is that 90% of this country's population is white, and if you don't belong to a 'model minority' (read: if you're Muslim), your life is NOT going to be easy, because if there's one thing the papers hate more than chavs, it's you. Let's not forget the fact that many who claim to be Islamophobes are actually 'Muslimphobes'. For people like that, supporters of the BNP and similar - the technicalities are unimportant. The colour of your skin says it all.
Hence this post. I have always made people uncomfortable. Sometimes it's something I enjoy, sometimes it's highly isolating. When I was younger and trying hard to be what my family wanted, I actually felt bad about the way I look. Why couldn't I look more like other Sikhs in my area? Why wasn't I a 'proper' Asian girl? Most of the Asian teenage girls I knew were identikit black-clad, feather-haired clones. However, as well as dress, their complexions and features united them. Most of them had a skin tone like Parminder Nagra's or Konnie Huq's, and were either long and skinny or tiny and skinny.
My family are all quite fair by Indian standards, but I was most definitely the freak. Naturally, this HAD to be topped off by my having a rounded body with large breasts. The day of reckoning, when I faced down my actual size, was terrifying enough without my mother's input. We were going to India soon afterwards, and I had to get bras my actual size. 'I'll get a few here and some in India,' I told her.
'No!' I knew she was appalled that I had let her down by allowing myself to be so un-Asian, but this was a bit much... 'They won't have them. Your size doesn't exist in India.'
I thought this was a joke. It wasn't. Every time we went shopping and even remotely neared a rack of underwear-type garments, I would start looking, with no success. Underwear aside, even most of the 'Western' clothes could only have been worn by me when I was hitting adolescence! My body was wrong. My face was most definitely wrong - I realised my features were not tiny and delicate, and I didn't have huge eyes like Indian women are often expected to have. Nor was I anywhere near being a Bollywood actress.
Men and women alike gawped at me and gave me hostile stares while I was in India. In France, people automatically asked where I was from whenever we were introduced, and when I was there with my ex-boyfriend (who is unmistakably Asian in comparison) we got some looks of absolute loathing. Even in this country, once I venture out of the little Asian enclave where I grew up, I notice people looking at me sharply. Some people are just curious of course, but the fact is that I make others uncomfortable. They can't 'place' me automatically, they can't fit characteristics and assumptions to me just like that. It should be fun, but it's often not. South Asian women often give me hostile and disapproving looks. I don't totally blame them for it, because Indian culture obsessively prizes fair-skinned women, leading to the coinage of the famously awkward term 'wheatish' in matrimonial adverts. Old white women have looked at me with a kind of disgust. That was just when I was with my white boyfriend!
On my own (and with him), I have had to deal with territorial behaviour and disapproving glances from Arab and Asian men alike. I've occasionally had white tourists look at me for that bit too long. I think the problem is that I look so close to white, but for those who are looking hard, my features have something oddly Arabic about them. My hair's a bit too dark. I'm not as rosy as a white person should be; nor am I white enough. Though it might sound crazy, sometimes I catch myself worrying that people look at us together because they think that I am 'not white enough for him'. Why do I even have to worry about shit like that?!
The point I'm trying to make, is that this just goes to show that white privilege does exist. Just because people aren't aware of how it works, or don't consciously choose to exploit it, it doesn't mean that it's not there. The only other people I know who've had similar experiences to mine are a) Asians/blacks who are perceived as 'wanting to be white' ('coconuts' or 'chickpeas', as I've been called myself) and b) mixed-race people. If you're white in this country, you're part of the majority and you get to be invisible. Even in London, where everyone wants to be invisible. Not even consciously, but recently I have perhaps begun trying to 'pass' more than previously. I say 'not consciously' because I do want to look different to other Asian girls, but not for research's sake - just because I love colour! The more I've tried to 'pass,' the more I see that I can't, not fully, but that it is advantageous to do so. Who thinks indie girls are 'exotic,' after all?
The whole thing doesn't generally bother me that much, because I like to have both parts to my identity: British and Asian. 'White' and 'brown.' Still, everyone has times where they want to belong, where it feels safer to be part of a pack, and frankly, I can't choose. Many middle-class Asian kids like to think they can 'choose' their identities by pretending to be black, but it doesn't really work. They are almost all eventually faced with the choice of being 'true to themselves,' being 'black' or being 'white.' Usually, 'true to themselves' means acting black for a while, then shifting back to becoming like a white middle-class person, with the extra Asian culture thrown in for good measure. White people never really get made to 'choose' unless it's the tired old narrative of 'selling out their class' by moving up socially. Even then, it's on one front. Try having to 'choose' twice over! Minority cultures dismiss their own for acting 'white,' but white people are allowed to 'act black.' For example, consider how common it is to have white rap artists (Beastie Boys, Eminem, Asher Roth, Skinnyman, etc. etc.); how many black or Asian artists can you think of who are as well-established in 'white' forms of music (country, indie, electro)? Kele from Bloc Party, TV On The Radio, er... Their (white people's) identity is not getting erased by their doing so - because they are over-represented everywhere in mainstream popular culture (and even more so in 'high' culture). To be invisible and yet omnipresent. What is that, if not privilege?
11 comments:
Bugger me- I really do not deserve to be taken so seriously!
I will make some vague attempt to respond- you see, I wasn't being wholly serious, but yes you could say many a true word is spoken in jest.
In reality, though, I am a liberal, a secularist & a universalist. Accordingly, I think I am actually to be considered a friend to you in your efforts to forge your own identity in the face of various people's disapproval.
This is a bit inarticulate- you'll have guessed that I hardly lie awake agonising about racial matters, but at the same time I think I've always viewed people as individuals rather than as part of whatever category, which is why I instinctively grate when I hear someone say that (for example) all Muslims are, or should be, the same- whether it's someone who damns them all from birth, or wo claims to be their friend but thinks they should belong to the same eternal, unchanging "community", & can't just be themselves.
Of interest also is the fact that I am completely different to the people around me &, in essence, I rejected the person I was "born" to be. I know people who really do conform to the stereotype of the chav, from similar homes to mine & living on the same street, but having always been different to that sort of shite I suppose I can instinctively understand a feminist living in a very severe patriarchy, or anyone who rejects an assigned role in life.
What I was interested by is your comment to the Heresiarch, because s/he has been so successful in casting a veil of anonymity that we don't actually know his/her race, gender, age, occupation or any other attributes. I suspect a white male who is a professional journalist. But no one knows for sure.
You do want to keep reading that blog though, it's top stuff.
asquith - Haha, I know! It was less a response to you in particular than it was a response to a certain kind of reluctance amongst white liberal males who aren't middle-class by birth.
Explaining privilege gets people's hackles up, but it's not an accusation directed in order to damn people to being part of 'one race' and not individuals; it's just to make them reflect on how the world around them is structured in relation to them.
'I know people who really do conform to the stereotype of the chav, from similar homes to mine & living on the same street,' - yes, I have a friend like that. She's blonde and from Essex and she sometimes feels insecure because she's not like most of the girls she knows from Dagenham. As in, she went to university and isn't married/pregnant yet. It's unbelievable.
I'm pretty sure I do know the Heresiarch's real identity, not least because they themselves revealed it in a little-read Cif article. That's why I know for certain they're white. Still, it would be churlish of me to go round shouting it about, so I've refrained thus far.
I will keep reading Heresy Corner, but no-one likes to be reminded that they're not the 'target audience' of something. I've found that too often, whether it's as a woman, or an Indian, or both. Given that it's a blog that USUALLY avoids right-wing standards such as 'Hmm... racism, maybe it WAS all in the non-white person's head?' I was just a bit disappointed.
I think it is necessary to put up with things that make us baulk- I read more than enough blogs that make generalisations about "lefties" (usually, painting a picture of someone who doesn't resemble me at all) but I wouldn't want to give up on the worthwhile things they offer.
Now, I do have a great respect for anonymity. In my view, "outing" is really not acceptable at all & should lead to ostracism of whoever did it- unless it's something really drastic like putting a child at risk, we should be at pains to deal with what they say rather than who they are.
Aye- nice bit of a detour etc.
Also I use phrases like "right-whinger" & am often found resorting to petty spite, but I hope conservatives don't ignore me or view me as irredeemably hostile as a response. Since I don't exactly propel the blogosphere to a higher standard, it's hardly my place to complain about the language employed by others.
Well, quite - that's why I won't stop reading.
I agree with you, and if the Heresiarch wants their identity protected despite effectively outing themselves elsewhere, then that's fine with me. Although some people who read my blog have met me in person, I don't necessarily want my identity plastered all over it. Hence some major trepidation about putting up my picture, but I guess it's elsewhere on this blog anyway, and none of them actually look like me! I'm not normally having that good a skin day!
Outing is pretty spiteful (as in the NightJack) case. I haven't really seen any instances where outing bloggers has been a massively good thing. Although I don't live for the blogosphere, so maybe I wouldn't!
asquith - For some reason, your last comment didn't show up for moderation until now. Weirdness!
I dunno. I get furious in my blog posts, but then again I write from the perspective that if I criticise a group of people, that either it should be very clear WHO that is, or that my readers will know.
In spaces that are not my immediate own, I'm generally fairly polite, except when something is beyond belief. I'm not immune to taking the piss then :-D.
I know how much language can hurt, my 'feminist reading' on language didn't instil that into me. Anyone who doesn't believe that verbal abuse can be as bad as physical to some extent, or that someone's having 'good intentions' excuses them from facing the effects of their words, can just eff off. Not that you said that. :-D
As a non-white feminist, I've never really expected to have much luck with conservatives. Odd, then, that I have attracted not one but at least THREE before! One of which is now my partner. I don't know what I'm doing wrong ;-P.
Perhaps they just can't resist a woman who is intelligent & self-aware- also evidently posessing a larger degree of courage than I can imagine myself ever having to have, not only insisted on being yourself rather than being squashed by your early experiences, but also to quite plainly lay this bare in front of others.
I like to think I've looked reasonably deeply into my own life & thought about myself & my place in humanity but I don't think I'd be able to write posts like that last one.
You could say that I take refuge in talking a load of utter shite (& it is a load, I talk relentlessly in real life, especially when nervous & meeting new people) that isn't of any importance to anyone :)
I am getting towards the view that there's no such thing as a bland, generic upbringing that "you might wish you'd had". We all have our stories to tell etc...
apart from me because I don't mention any serious personal thoughts I may have :)
'Perhaps they just can't resist a woman who is intelligent & self-aware- also evidently posessing a larger degree of courage than I can imagine myself ever having to have, not only insisted on being yourself rather than being squashed by your early experiences, but also to quite plainly lay this bare in front of others.'
Crikey! Thanks *blushes*.
'You could say that I take refuge in talking a load of utter shite (& it is a load, I talk relentlessly in real life, especially when nervous & meeting new people) that isn't of any importance to anyone :)'
If ever you come to a Pickled Politics meet-up, you will see me in action, doing this.
Most people do get squeamish about their personal thoughts. That's fair enough - they imagine they might be used against them. However, *handy side-effect of my upbringing* there's not a lot that outsiders can do to upset me now, because when you've taken that shit from your family, you're none too ready to take it from anyone else.
My narratives always have been, and always will be, my sanity and refuge. This blog began when I was still a teen; one way I kept myself sane and got distance from my family was by writing my feelings down, immobilising the anger and grief and documenting it.
à
tête
blanche?
no?
girlfriend,
if
don't
engage
in
omphaloskepsis
in
a
blog,
then,
where
can
you?
your lips suggest possibly middleeastern progenitors but your head suggests an admixture of the brachycephalic and the dolichocephalic yet i'd be somewhat reticent to say, indubitably, it's mesocephalic.
who came up with zero?
who came up with 1-9?
pacis exsisto super mihi.
Lol Muhamad, have you been at the crack pipe again?
au contraire
(mon lumineux[?])
seriously tho, to dispel all doubt you should get Oxford DNA or something to check your genetic ancestry.
Post a Comment